KKK!!! Update on whole astrology B-S

In case you dont know whats going in corporate world, of new age astrology, heres an example, OF mythical corporated bullshit at its finessssst.

http://www.nbc-2.com/Global/story.asp?S=13828331

cleARLY THIS ARTICLE STATES THAT THE EARTH ALIGNMENT IS DIFFERENT FROM, 3000 YEARS AGO, WHICH at the time COINCIDED WITH THE ZODIAC SIGNS of the planetary allignment of the earth.

Now what these people say!

THIS TAROT.COM REPSONSE TO MY LETTER. THEY SENT ME THIS. AND LET ME BRIEFLY EXPLAIN THE ORDEAL BEFORE YOU GET ALONG TO READING THIS. They some how put it some "moon shift' theory on scientist,w hich they didnt even, talk about. And say that "NO we're wrong, yes we're right."

Kk heres 't the letter. Ihope you read the above. Link, i sent you.

http://www.dailyhoroscope.com/horoscope-headlines/scientists-say-astrology-horoscope-zodiac-signs-wrong

Is your zodiac sign wrong? That's the hot topic in mainstream media, which is suggesting that the Moon's gravitational pull may have shifted the zodiac by a whole month. Don't panic. Our expert astrologers are stepping in to set the cosmic story straight.

It wasn't long ago that news of Pluto's planetary status being bumped to "dwarf" was all over the headlines. And it seems that every six months or so scientists unveil new planets and celestial bodies in our galaxy.

It's fine and dandy to keep tabs on the amazing discoveries in our solar system, and we're always glad when Astrology hits the national news. But when that news is wrong ... well, we're here to remove the cosmic clutter.

One such bit of cosmic clutter is a FOX News story by Jeremy A. Kaplan ("Age of Aquarius Actually Age of Capricorn, Thanks to Rotation of the Earth"), in which Kaplan refers to findings from the Minnesota Planetarium Society that suggest there's been a "one-month bump in the alignment of the stars" and that Astrology is "all wrong."

This and other news stories as heard on TV, radio andprint all seem to suggest a state of astrological emergency -- YOUR SUN SIGN MAY BE A WHOLE MONTH OFF! Do not panic. That's FALSE.

Unlike the scientists who did not check their facts, we went straight to astrology expert Jeff Jawer to clean up this confusion and explain what really is going on.

"There is no truth in this," Jawer said. "Western astrologers use the Tropical zodiac, which is based on the seasons, not the signs. Anyone who seriously researches the subject would know that."

Jawer shares these three simple facts to help clear up the astrological matter (pardon the pun):

1. Astrology is Earth-centric. Not star- or Moon-centric. If the Moon's relative position to the stars changes, that doesn't mean the zodiac changes.
2. Western astrologers have used a Tropical or season-based zodiac for about 2,500 years. That is why time and location of birth are so important.
3. The signs of the zodiac, while represented in constellations, are not derived or aligned exclusively with constellations (although they did so coincidentally around 2000 years ago.)

The good news? This lunar shift isn't news. Western Astrology as we know it remains intact and you will not be faced with a horoscope sign identity crisis anytime soon. Learn why all the media hype around this 13th sign is wrong.

Leave us a comment and let us know what you think about this cosmic controversy!

If you like what you see on dailyhoroscope.com, please consider following us on Facebook and Twitter. We need your help to spread the word and fill the world with good Karma!

iI agree with these two individuals

Violet says:

Thu, 01/13/2011 - 23:41

Waitaminute - you mean to tell us that the alignment of the stars ISN'T what you've been feeding us this whole time?? So why the "it's in the stars" talk? You mean to tell us that it was "just a coincidence" that the Zodiac actually aligned with the Zodiac about 2000 years ago and we based a lot of belief on what we ACTUALLY SAW line up in the heavens, but that's not what is "REALLY" important?

Wow. This sounds like a lot of people who make a living off of feeding people something to believe are now rushing feverishly to save their butts by patching up the myth to their liking. I, for one, am totally stoked to be given an opportunity for my myth to be reborn, and embrace that my actual birth event lines up with an actual constellation other than what I've long thought. If I'm going to invite the stars to give me an opportunity for reflection and metaphor, it might as well line up to the actual stars, and not some man-made hand-waving gesture like you're trying to peddle now in an effort to convince everyone that you haven't been "wrong" all this time. If I wanted man-made, I'd stick to Christianity. The myth is beautiful, people. Let it just be a myth and it can still work beautifully without all the dogma.

and...

John Itanimulli says:

Thu, 01/13/2011 - 20:49

This article is just about as bad the article its trying to refute. Nowhere are astronomers claiming that the Moon has changed the zodiac signs. Its precession of the Earth that has changed the sky.

The guy quoted in the Fox article clearly has no idea what he is talking about. But in the end it doesn't matter as astrology is superstitious garbage anyway.

KKK. feud done =)

have a nice day

Skittles and Coffee =)

Well, i am just here anonymously cooking in the thousands of information, from the computer,.surging in from the internet from friends... and from fellow UFO, Mediums, Monks Psychics, Scientific expertise community, Spiritual research advocates. My conscious mind, today... is pooped. Joseph the Giant (my sleepy bear), knocked out in 4 minutes flat from watching this video presentation from Project Camelot.

(which by the way you can watch some of the presentations on youtube =))

i love 2012, conspiracies, so interesting >

Anyways when it comes to the "Change of the Zodiacs" most of these people admit to not even caring much about the zodiac.

so whats up with all this attachment, and bickering of age old zodiac "attachments". Like their own personal mysterious mythical nature suddenly dies out with their "zodiac sign" what a confused nature aren't we? Its all mythological in their perception anyway...and for most of the fundamentalist well-to-do atheist/spiritually correct people. WOuldn't it be safer to not rule out science from your stream of consciousness?

gee what a bunch of age older well-to-doer's cave men. why can't you just give me the age old back of the rebel pep talk that "you dont care". You dont care about these "uperstitious mystical things"

Especially when it comes to all these mysterious superstitious stuff that most of you previously considered to be like junk mail, why are you most at the forefront of defending your title??? Anyways regardless if i am wrong or right about this particular statement, isn't it better to say that "I am not attached to anything, especially names/titles?" What kind of spiritualist are you? Especially For all you hardcore "spiritualist" and spiritualist practitioners...of Wicca, of New Age what ever, Christianity or what ever...why are you fighting the facts?

What is it that you want to prove??? Aks yourself,that and answer that honestly.

Because true spiritualist, THEY DON'T GIVE A f***. AND IF YOUR A POSITIVE ROLEMODEL (OR AT-LEAST TRYING TO PRESENT YOURSELF AS ONE)

THEN YOU SHOULD BE AT THE FOREFRONT OF EMBRACING CHANGGEEEEEEEEE.
but, i guess its all about being delusional and backwards now a days....and defending your age old title.

kk, i just wrote www.tarot.com a question concerning their astrology department. Lets see, if i get a reply...

"Hello,

i have been coming to tarot.com, for a long time, i loved all the insight your site has provided to me in the course of its time. I have been visiting your site for years, and I have a question. I heard about the new discovery in Astrology of the earth's tilt, and its impact that it has on our astrological sign... Will you include this change on our readings?

i am hoping for an accurate portrayal of an astrological reading for my sign. And i'm just curious of the impact, that this new discovery will have on my readings. If they can still be represented accurately.

Thank you so much for your time concerning my question."

Sincerely,

Jessica